IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Car and Driver scan, performance
tames
post Mar 23 2008, 11:03 AM
Post #1


NAGTROC Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 3-March 08
Member No.: 13,057













The car tested had the cold weather pkg!

High-res scans: Attached File  Car_Driver_GTRx.pdf ( 951.63K ) Number of downloads: 4187
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tames
post Mar 23 2008, 11:15 AM
Post #2


NAGTROC Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 3-March 08
Member No.: 13,057



Is everyone happy now? Sorry it took so long, but I believe it was worth the wait!!!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rabenoja
post Mar 23 2008, 11:31 AM
Post #3


R34 Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,527
Joined: 30-September 07
Member No.: 12,052



QUOTE (tames @ Mar 23 2008, 10:15 AM) *
Is everyone happy now? Sorry it took so long, but I believe it was worth the wait!!!!!


yourock.gif Thanks for the scan!

They used the launch control 15 times!!! Wow...just wow.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clokwork
post Mar 23 2008, 11:43 AM
Post #4


R33 Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 643
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Virginia
Member No.: 11,691



sweeeeeeeeeet


--------------------
Dark Metal Gray/Gun Metal | Black Interior | Premium Package | Ipod Connector | Floor Mats |
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShahulX
post Mar 23 2008, 11:48 AM
Post #5


Who Dat Superbowl CHAMPS !!
******

Group: Members
Posts: 6,998
Joined: 19-March 07
From: Germantown MD
Member No.: 11,568



wow, great read .... They mentioned the weight quite a bit


--------------------
Delivered !! 8/05/08 2009 NISSAN GTR PREMIUM.... Ivory Pearl with Black leather "VERA"


AMUSE front air splitter (painted )
PWJDM CF rear diffuser fins
Hasemi carbon fiber rear spoiler gurney
Cobb Accessport
AAM Competition Downpipes (catless)
AAM Competition midpipe (non resonated catless)
AAM Oil Cooler
AAM Wastegate actuators
AAM Cold Air intakes
AAM V2.5 Catback (no mufflers, black tips)
HKS EVC Boost controller
HKS Spark plugs
Denso 800cc injectors
AMS FMIC
AP Intercooler pipes
AP BOV's
Eibach springs
KW Variant 3 coilovers (to be installed)
Whiteline Rear sway bar
T1R Steel braided brake lines
Carbotech XP12 brake pads
Toyo R888 Tires 20"
Willall led Shift lights
Upgraded fluids ( Willall V-Spec tranny, engine and diff with motul brake)
Downforce CF headlamp surrounds
Clear corners, Clear Bra, tint
Valentine One
NEXT: mild tranny upgrades, rotors, trans cooler, radiator, weight reduction

Also:
2010 Volkswagen GTi MK6 4dr DSG (carbon grey) w/ Dunlop Direzza Star Specs, Hawk HP Plus and eibach springs
1987 Bmw E30 325 for Rallycross


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcduck
post Mar 23 2008, 11:52 AM
Post #6


SpecV Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,399
Joined: 18-August 04
Member No.: 1,866



yep... excellent article. though, the naysayers are going to be quick to point out "engineering test mule" headshake.gif


--------------------
Best 1/4mile to date - 11.122 @ 126.98mph (with LC) / 11.484 @ 122.18mph (without LC)
Best VIR lap (full course) - 2:15 (est)
Highest speed attained to date - 191mph




"it’s not beautiful, nor is it trying to be. It is what it is. It’s a weapon. And killing isn’t pretty business." - tekknikal, Dec 2007
"It corners faster than electricity." - Jeremy Clarkson, Top Gear Season 11 Episode 5
"people need to stop looking at peak HP so much... The area under the curve is what matters.." - mcduck, May 2009
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tames
post Mar 23 2008, 11:52 AM
Post #7


NAGTROC Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 3-March 08
Member No.: 13,057



Well that just goes to show u that the engine must be far under reated as mentioned in the article... I really dont care bout the weight now, but when/if the spec V comes hope the car goes on a serious diet.
Still cant wait to get the car and add exhaust/cpu, and a little more boost, can u say rocket?????
I don't think Nissan would be stupid enough and not have the production car slower than the tester. Remember this is HUGE for Nissan, also the GT-R tested had 3500 miles on it. They say cars get a little quicker as they break in.... i am more than happy with this test
Also when u consider the other test in Road and Track, how can they have a production vehicle. I did not believe they made any yet? Sure they have a US Spec, but no mass production cars are available.

KING IT IS GOOD TO SEE U BACK ON A THREAD I CREATED.... HOPE IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF ROYALTY

This post has been edited by tames: Mar 23 2008, 12:00 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the King
post Mar 23 2008, 12:03 PM
Post #8


R35 Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,903
Joined: 16-September 07
Member No.: 11,986



It is Car and Driver's test mule not Nissan's. All this does is the validate the fact that the GT-R has exceeded expectations of even the most rabid fan. The weight is mentioned but in the context that it is impossible for a car with this amount of lard to dance the way it does. But it does.
I love the fact that the mitsubishi 3000GT was mentioned. That was a car ahead of its time. It failed becuase Mitsubishi wasnt sure how to market it and people didnt know what to make of it. Had it been a Honda, it is highly likely it would have been more successsful than even the NSX.


--------------------
]"The GT-R shares the assassin's single-minded sense of purpose.It is brutally cold, clinical and calculating." ---- Evo mag's Car of the Year.

Modds to do:
For Lightness
1) Mine's carbon fibre doors, hood, trunk, front bumper and splitter. 2) Spec V Ti exhaust system 3) AP Racing brake kit 4) Nismo Spec V suspension and wheels. 5) Nismo transmission cooler kit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
masssrt
post Mar 23 2008, 12:04 PM
Post #9


R32 Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 20-October 07
Member No.: 12,151



Dam!! 11.5 at 124?? wow that trap speed keeps goin up
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
240ka
post Mar 23 2008, 12:09 PM
Post #10


R32 Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 394
Joined: 10-January 08
Member No.: 12,715



this car is so amazing looking in movement.

This post has been edited by 240ka: Mar 23 2008, 12:20 PM


--------------------
Jeremy of TOP GEAR on the GT-R
"..I dare say that if Michael Schumacher were to find himself in the eye of an Arctic blizzard, escaping from an exploding volcano, he might discover 10% of this car's abilities. But you? Me? Here? Forget it. Nissan, then, has done something odd. It has built a car for a time and a place and a species that simply don't exist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neoseven
post Mar 23 2008, 12:12 PM
Post #11


SpecV Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,462
Joined: 5-December 07
From: NorCal
Member No.: 12,460



QUOTE (mcduck @ Mar 23 2008, 11:52 AM) *
yep... excellent article. though, the naysayers are going to be quick to point out "engineering test mule" headshake.gif


Yeah, I was disappointed they used that wording, especially when the only thing test mule about it was this was one of the cars Nissan North America was testing suspension settings on for US roads. You notice what they state about the car in comfort mode on rough road now. This should make all those that were so worried about a rough ride happy.

Let the naysayers cry out all they want, who really cares. Can you really blame them. If you had invested $120,000 into a Porsche 911 turbo and a $70,000 car from Nissan took your game away, how would you feel? lmfao.gif

Great article.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
REK125
post Mar 23 2008, 12:17 PM
Post #12


R34 Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,567
Joined: 30-October 07
From: Malvern, PA
Member No.: 12,259



Better than advertised. Now we can delete the GTR vs Z06 vs Porsche thread. It is now irrevelant. GODZILLA RULES1111
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the King
post Mar 23 2008, 12:20 PM
Post #13


R35 Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,903
Joined: 16-September 07
Member No.: 11,986



QUOTE (tames @ Mar 23 2008, 11:52 AM) *
Well that just goes to show u that the engine must be far under reated as mentioned in the article... I really dont care bout the weight now, but when/if the spec V comes hope the car goes on a serious diet.
Still cant wait to get the car and add exhaust/cpu, and a little more boost, can u say rocket?????
I don't think Nissan would be stupid enough and not have the production car slower than the tester. Remember this is HUGE for Nissan, also the GT-R tested had 3500 miles on it. They say cars get a little quicker as they break in.... i am more than happy with this test
Also when u consider the other test in Road and Track, how can they have a production vehicle. I did not believe they made any yet? Sure they have a US Spec, but no mass production cars are available.

KING IT IS GOOD TO SEE U BACK ON A THREAD I CREATED.... HOPE IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF ROYALTY

Great to be here mate and yes it does meet the standard and exceeded them!!! lmfao.gif
Not only because of your scans but I think I may have been a tad bit on the short fuse. I misread your intentions on that thread and only thought it was one more person trying to start the Z06 vs GT-R war.
I did revisit the thread and found a vibrant discussion going on. I can accept when I put my foot in my mouth(in this case my fingers lol) I am not afraid to say I was wrong and apologize. No worries mate.

Now I agree with your assessment about the GT-R and the car tested with miles on it. It validates the point a number of us tried to make on a thread regarding break in period. Yes there are production vehicles but this is the US Car and a new market--new expectations.
I guess Nissan felt it prudent to allow the car to be tested by independent sources(people will se that the car is for real).
A great marketing strategy!!
You will note that C&D plan on doing comparison tests and dynos just to validate the numbers. This car I guess will be in Car and Driver's garage for a while.
Can you remember any car been put through the wringer like this?
15 launches!!


--------------------
]"The GT-R shares the assassin's single-minded sense of purpose.It is brutally cold, clinical and calculating." ---- Evo mag's Car of the Year.

Modds to do:
For Lightness
1) Mine's carbon fibre doors, hood, trunk, front bumper and splitter. 2) Spec V Ti exhaust system 3) AP Racing brake kit 4) Nismo Spec V suspension and wheels. 5) Nismo transmission cooler kit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neoseven
post Mar 23 2008, 12:20 PM
Post #14


SpecV Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,462
Joined: 5-December 07
From: NorCal
Member No.: 12,460



I think the biggest thing that bothers me about the changes for the US spec car, other than the softer suspension, is the seats for fat asses. I'm 6'2" 170lbs. I think I might be swimming in these new barco lounges they put in our cars. I may as well order up some Recaro's now. I bet I can find an interested buyer for some R35 GT-R seats.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NissanGTR
post Mar 23 2008, 12:23 PM
Post #15


R33 Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 20-May 06
From: Windermere, FL
Member No.: 10,454



So 17/21 on the fuel mileage, is that enough to avoid the gas guzzler tax?


--------------------
'09 GT-R Ti/Black
'09 Murano LE Deep Sapphire/Black
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chuck_H
post Mar 23 2008, 12:27 PM
Post #16


THE ORG
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 5,974
Joined: 1-August 06
From: Florida
Member No.: 11,210



Thanks for the scans.

thumb.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neoseven
post Mar 23 2008, 12:32 PM
Post #17


SpecV Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,462
Joined: 5-December 07
From: NorCal
Member No.: 12,460



QUOTE (Chuck_H @ Mar 23 2008, 12:27 PM) *
Thanks for the scans. thumb.gif

How can I convert pdf files to jpeg? Would like to also load these into the gallery.


If your on a Macintosh using OS 10, open it in preview and save it as a jpeg.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DbestiZ1
post Mar 23 2008, 12:33 PM
Post #18


NAGTROC Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 25-February 08
Member No.: 12,985



I like the article but it did seem a bit blunted, I was hoping they would have gone a few more pages in on their opinions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neoseven
post Mar 23 2008, 12:38 PM
Post #19


SpecV Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,462
Joined: 5-December 07
From: NorCal
Member No.: 12,460



jpegs here
http://s149.photobucket.com/albums/s77/neoseven/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tere
post Mar 23 2008, 12:40 PM
Post #20


R32 Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 27-December 07
From: San Antonio, TX
Member No.: 12,600



QUOTE (tames @ Mar 23 2008, 09:03 AM) *
The car tested had the cold weather pkg!
They actually got it wrong. It didn't have the cold weather package -- note the gunmetal wheels in all the photos, and if you look in the actual tire specs, the tires are the Dunlops that come standard with the base model -- Dunlop high performance Y rated tires (the Dunlop all-seasons are W rated). What they actually tested (also based on price) was a base model with i-Pod option. The base is just a wee bit lighter than the premium.


--------------------
Tere and the current Z Car inventory
2007 San Marino Blue 350Z Touring Roadster - WHIZZY
2003 Blown Brickyard Performance 350Z (Approx. SGP Stage XI) - FLYIN Z
1991 White 300ZX Twin Turbo (SGP Stage V+) - Z FLYBY
2006 Slate Crystal Pearl SRT-10 Viper coupe - TX ASP
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st July 2010 - 11:46 PM
Design and Concept by Attitude
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Bridged By IpbWiki: Integration Of Invision Power Board and MediaWiki © GlobalSoft